United States v. Stith
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
HOLIFIELD, HACKEL, and MCCOY
Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES
Appellee v.
Anthony D. STITH
Master-at-Arms Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202100335 _________________________ Decided: 2 June 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge:
M. Christopher Cox
Sentence adjudged 31 August 2021 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 3 days and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________ United States v. Stith, NMCCA No. 202100335 Opinion of the Court PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.