United States v. Nesbit
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER
Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES
Appellee v.
Alexander NESBIT
Electronics Technician Nuclear Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202100325 _________________________ Decided: 30 March 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge:
Rachel E. Trest
Sentence adjudged 20 August 2021 by a general court-martial convened at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confine- ment for 6 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Major Brian Farrell, USMC _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________ United States v. Nesbit, NMCCA No. 202100325 Opinion of the Court PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.