United States v. Brantley

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before

GASTON, HOUTZ, and BURGTORF

Appellate Military Judges _________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee v.

Harrison D. BRANTLEY

Machinist’s Mate Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant

No. 202200015

Decided: 17 March 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge:

Matthew C. Cox

Sentence adjudged 2 November 2021 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-3, con- finement for 62 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant:

Commander Kyle C. Kneese, JAGC, USN _________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________ United States v. Brantley, NMCCA No. 202200015 Opinion of the Court PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.