United States v. Banfield
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GASTON, HOUTZ, and MYERS
Appellate Military Judges _________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee v.
Jevon J. BANFIELD
Information Systems Technician Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202100191 _________________________
Decided: 27 January 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge:
Angela J. Tang
Sentence adjudged 17 March 2021 by a special court-martial convened at the Washington Navy Yard, District of Columbia, consisting of a mil- itary judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-2, confinement for 6 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________ United States v. Banfield, NMCCA No. 202100191 Opinion of the Court PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.