United States v. SCOTT

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before

HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and THORNHILL

Appellate Military Judges _________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee v.

Kianna C. SCOTT

Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 202400361 _________________________

Decided: 7 February 2025

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judges:

Andrea Lockhart (arraignment)

Kevin S. Quencer (trial)

Sentence adjudged 27 June 2024 by a special court-martial tried at Na- val Base San Diego, San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con- finement for thirty days, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant:

Lieutenant Commander Brendan C. Horgan, JAGC, USNR United States v. Scott, NMCCA No. 202400361 Opinion of the Court _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________ PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON

Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.