United States v. BRATTIN
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
KISOR, MCCOY, and HARRELL
Appellate Military Judges _________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee v.
Remington T. BRATTIN
Machinist’s Mate (Nuclear) Petty Officer Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202400384 _________________________
Decided: 30 April 2025
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge:
Michael F. Whitican
Sentence adjudged 26 July 2024 by a general court-martial tried at Na- val Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con- finement for twenty-four months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a dishonorable discharge.
For Appellant:
Captain Katherine E. Malcolm, USMC United States v. Brattin, NMCCA No. 202400384 Opinion of the Court _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________ PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON
Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.