United States v. RODRIGUEZ

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before DALY, GROSS, and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Trevor J. RODRIGUEZ Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 202400263 _________________________ Decided: 26 September 2025 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: John P. Norman Sentence adjudged 1 June 2022 by a special court-martial tried at Ma- rine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: forfeiture of $1,500 per month for one month, reduction to E-3, confinement for 30 days, and restriction to the limits of Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, for 30 days.

For Appellant: Captain Colin P. Norton, USMC United States v. Rodriguez, NMCCA No. 202400263 Opinion of the Court _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________ PER CURIAM 1: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

1 Senior Judge GROSS would have specified for briefing the following issue: WAS THE EVIDENCE FACTUALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN APPELLANT’S CON- VICTION FOR VIOLATION OF A LAWFUL GENERAL ORDER IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 92, UCMJ?

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.