United States v. BRAVO

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before DALY, GROSS, and FLUHR Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Andy BRAVO Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 202500437 _________________________ Decided: 4 May 2026 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Todd J. Gaston Sentence adjudged 24 July 2025 by a special court-martial tried at Ma- rine Corps Base Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con- finement for 89 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Major Colin W. Hotard, USMCR United States v. Bravo, NMCCA No. 202500437 Opinion of the Court _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________ PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights oc- curred. 1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.