Hight v. Wilson
Hight v. Wilson
1 U.S. 94; 1 Dall. 94
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Estate of Fleishman (California Superior Court, San Francisco County 1892)
- Neustadt v. Coline Oil Co. (Okla. 1929)
- Lacey v. Dobbs (N.J. 1901)
- Chase v. Kittredge (Mass. 1865)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
in his charge to the jury, informed them, 1st. That it was not necessary that a will, devising real estate in this Commonwealth, should be sealed. 2d. Nor that all the subscribing witnesses should prove the execution. 3d. Nor that the proof of the will should be made by those who subscribed as witnesses. 4th. Nor that the will should be subscribed by the witnesses. †
†
See post. Lewis Appellant versus Maris Appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.