Ross v. Clarke
Ross v. Clarke
1 U.S. 354; 1 Dall. 354
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A. (Pa. 1989)
- Howard's Estate (Nev. 1924)
- Norton v. Clark (Nev. 1884)
- Hill v. Beach (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1858)
- Stratton v. Ham (Ind. 1856)
- Winton v. State ex rel. Ezra (Ind. 1853)
- Shinn v. Zimmerman (N.J. 1851)
- Burrill v. Letson (S.C. Ct. App. 1844)
- Corbyn v. Bollman (Pa. 1842)
- Bushel v. Commonwealth Insurance (Pa. 1827)
- Dawson v. Holcomb (Ohio 1824)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The money is to be considered in the same state, as if it had been paid into the hands of the Sheriff. If a proceeding of this kind were allowed, there could be no end to suits. We are unanimously of opinion, that the foreign attachment has issued irregularly and ought to be quashed.
The rule made absolute.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.