Supreme Court of the United States, 1793

Stansbury v. Marks

Stansbury v. Marks
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 1, 1793
4 U.S. 130; 4 Dall. 130; 1 L. Ed. 771; 1793 U.S. LEXIS 227 (United States Reports)

Stansbury v. Marks

Opinion

4 U.S. 130 (____)
4 Dall. 130

Stansbury
versus
Marks.

Supreme Court of United States.

By the COURT:

The evidence is clearly admissible. Under the general issue, however, the jury may decide, whether the evidence is sufficient to discharge him, or not. The position is generally true, that an infant can only bind himself for necessaries; yet, in the Court of Chancery, cases occur, in which a payment would be decreed, contrary to the strict rule of the common law. In this form of action, equity is the principal consideration; and, from necessity, the Courts of law, in Pennsylvania, adopt the principles of the English Courts of Chancery.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.