Pleasants v. Pemberton
Pleasants v. Pemberton
2 U.S. 196; 2 Dall. 196; 1 L. Ed. 346; 1793 U.S. LEXIS 233
(United States Reports)
Opinion
The general .expreflion in Walton1 &¡* Shelley muft be limited as explained in 3 Term. 33. 6. and, therefore, lince the witnefs is difinterefted, he muft be admitted. Befides, he is not to contradict the writing, or deny any thing that is in it.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.