Turner v. Enrille
Turner v. Enrille
4 U.S. 7; 1 L. Ed. 717; 4 Dall. 7; 1799 U.S. LEXIS 245
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision. The 20 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Wayne Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management (Fed. Cir. 1983)
- Blockbuster, Inc. v. Michael Galeno, Docket No. 05-8019-Cv (2d Cir. 2006)
- Alasaad v. Duke (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2019)
- Chair King, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Houston Cellular Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Karen Laake, Etc. (5th Cir. 1997)
- Johnson v. Smith (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1986)
- Home Insurance Co. v. Thomas Duckett Construction Co. (In re Rush) (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama 1985)
- Precon, Inc. v. JRS Realty Trust (In re Brown) (District Court, D. Maine 1985)
- Musifilm, B v. v. Spector (District Court, S.D. New York 1983)
- Gavelek v. Coscol Petroleum Corp. (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1979)
- Fairfax Countywide Citizens Ass'n v. County of Fairfax (4th Cir. 1978)
- Tanner v. McCall (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1977)
- Marshall v. Reinhold Construction, Inc. (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1977)
- Rodriguez v. Union Oil Co. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1954)
- Wood v. State Ex Rel. Gillespie (Miss. 1932)
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Spiller (Supreme Court of the United States 1927)
- Rosenberg v. Shuler (United States District Court, Oklahoma Eastern 1923)
- Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins (Supreme Court of the United States 1885)
- Camp v. Wood (Pa. 1840)
- Lewis v. Cooper and Flynn (Tenn. 1814)
- Lewis v. Cooper & Flynn (Tenn. 1814)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Turner, Administrator,
versus
Enrille.
Supreme Court of United States.
*8 For the defendant in error, Dallas lamented the obvious irregularities on the face of the record.
By the COURT.
The decision in the case of Bingham v. Cabot et al. must govern the present case. Let the judgment be reversed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.