Supreme Court of the United States, 1801

Commonwealth v. Dallas

Commonwealth v. Dallas
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided September 1, 1801 · Shippen
4 U.S. 229; 4 Dall. 229 (United States Reports)
Commonwealth v. Dallas

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

4 U.S. 229 (____)
4 Dall. 229

The Commonwealth
versus
Dallas, Attorney of the United States, &c.

Supreme Court of United States.

*230 The argument was conducted, with great and equal ability and candour, by Messrs. Hopkinson, E. Tilghman, and Lewis, in support of the motion; and by Messrs. Ingersoll and M`Kean, against it.

*231 SHIPPEN, Chief Justice:

That although the Recorder of the city of Philadelphia possesses some powers, and performs some duties, of a judicial nature, he is not a judge, within the terms, spirit, and meaning, of the 8th section of the 2d article of the constitution.

The motion, for leave to file an information, in the nature of a quo warranto, was, therefore, refused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.