Supreme Court of the United States, 1802

COCHRAN v. Cummings

COCHRAN v. Cummings
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 1, 1802 · By Shippen
4 U.S. 250; 4 Dall. 250; 1 L. Ed. 820; 1802 U.S. LEXIS 96 (United States Reports)

COCHRAN v. Cummings

Opinion

4 U.S. 250 (____)
4 Dall. 250

Cochran et al.
versus
Cummings.

Supreme Court of United States.

Ingersoll, and Heatly, for the plaintiffs.

M. Levy, and Porter, for the defendant.

By SHIPPEN, Chief Justice:

Wherever there is a gross misrepresentation of facts, relating to the subject of a contract, the contract is fraudulent and void. If, therefore, the jury shall be of opinion, that such a misrepresentation was made, in the present instance; they should consider the conveyance as no payment, although the plaintiffs agreed, under the deception, to accept it in satisfaction; and the verdict must be for damages to the whole amount of the demand.

Verdict, accordingly, for the plaintiffs' whole demand.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.