Supreme Court of the United States, 1807

O'Neale v. Long

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 14, 1807 · Marshall

8 U.S. 60; 2 L. Ed. 550; 4 Cranch 60; 1807 U.S. LEXIS 366 (United States Reports)

Counsel

*P. B. Key, for the plaintiff in error,, Mason, contra,

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Moen v. Moen (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2023)
Wright v. Farmers Insurance (District Court, W.D. Washington 2021)
Eaton v. Cavalia (USA) Inc. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2020)
Keilsohn v. Slaton (Ga. 1915)
Tucker v. Stewart (Iowa 1903)
Anderson v. Bellenger & Ralls (Ala. 1888)
Covert v. Shirk (Ind. 1877)
State ex rel. McCarty v. Pepper (Ind. 1869)
People v. Brown (Mich. 1845)
Humphreys v. Guillow (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1843)
Long v. Oneale (District Court, District of Columbia 1804)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court, that there was error in this, that the court below did not instruct the jury as prayed by the defendant. He observed, that the judges did not all agree upon the same grounds, some being of opinion, that the bonds were void, by reason of the interlineation, and others, that they were vacated by the rejection of them by the magistrate, and could not be set up again, without a new delivery.

Judgment reversed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.