after stating the case, observed that the Court could see no error in the judgment.

The payment of the money by the Plaintiff, under the circumstances stated in the count, was a sufficient consideration for the assumpsit.

The principal objection was that the count ought to have been founded upon the mote, so as to oblige the Plaintiff to produce it on the trial. But it states that *276 the note was paid by the Plaintiff: and the Court5' thinks that the note must have been produced upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed,.