Davis v. Wood
Cases that cite this one
29 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State v. Marshall (Mo. 1897)
- Ronald N. Ashley v. City of Jackson, Mississippi (Supreme Court of the United States 1983)
- Young Ah Chor v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of America (9th Cir. 1959)
- Brewster v. Villa (5th Cir. 1937)
- Fielder v. Pemberton (Tenn. 1916)
- United States v. Hills (District Court, W.D. New York 1903)
- Keller v. Johnson (District Court, D. Nevada 2024)
- Kabir v. City of Elk Grove (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2022)
- Storz Management Co. v. Carey (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
- Linton v. Becerra (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2020)
- Fulkerson v. Costco Wholesale Corporation (District Court, D. Nevada 2020)
- Valenzuela v. Schmidt (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2019)
- Ashe v. . Pettiford (N.C. 1919)
- Donnelly v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1913)
- Stone v. Commonwealth (Mass. 1902)
- Hamilton & Son v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1886)
- Carter v. Montgomery (Tenn. Ct. App. 1875)
- Vigil v. Naylor (Supreme Court of the United States 1861)
- Burlen v. Shannon (Mass. 1855)
- Chamberlain v. Carlisle (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1853)
- Chambers v. Lapsley (Pa. 1847)
- Brown v. Chaney (Ga. 1846)
- Allen v. Roundtree (S.C. Ct. App. 1842)
- Ellicott v. Pearl (Supreme Court of the United States 1836)
- Brown v. Crandall (Conn. 1835)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered, the opinion of the court, and stated, that, as. tp the first exception, the court had revised its opinion in the case of Mima Queen and child v. Hepburn, and confirmed it. As to the second exception, the record Was not between the same parties. The rule is, that Verdicts are evidence between parties and privies. The court does *9 not feel inclined to enlargte the exceptions to this general rule,' and, therefore, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.