Gracie v. Palmer
Cases that cite this one
41 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- In re Moore (Supreme Court of the United States 1908)
- Harding v. Standard Oil Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois 1909)
- United States v. Freeman (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1937)
- Merko v. Sturm & Dillard Co. (6th Cir. 1916)
- Puget Sound Sheet Metal Works v. Great Northern Ry. Co. (District Court, W.D. Washington 1912)
- Platt v. Massachusetts Real-Estate Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts 1900)
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad (Supreme Court of the United States 1894)
- Romaine v. Union Ins. Co. (United States Circuit Courts 1886)
- Lovejoy v. Hartford Fire Ins. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1882)
- State Ex Rel. Lea v. Brown (Tenn. 1933)
- Handley-Mack Co. v. Godchaux Sugar Co. (6th Cir. 1924)
- Commonwealth v. Poteet (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas 1924)
- Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1923)
- Ex Parte Chicago, RI & Pac. Ry. (Supreme Court of the United States 1921)
- Ex parte Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1921)
- United States v. Mayer (Supreme Court of the United States 1914)
- United States v. Mayer (Supreme Court of the United States 1914)
- Iowa Lillooet Gold Min. Co. v. Bliss (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa 1906)
- Fisher, Sons & Co. v. Crowley (W. Va. 1905)
- State v. Thacker Coal & Coke Co. (W. Va. 1901)
- Blair v. Henderson (W. Va. 1901)
- Scott v. Hoover (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California 1900)
- Creagh v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington 1897)
- Interior Construction & Improvement Co. v. Gibney (Supreme Court of the United States 1895)
- Newman v. Schwerin (6th Cir. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
stated, that the uniform construction, under the clause of the act referred to, had been, that it was not necessary to aver, on the record, that the defendant was an inhabitant of the district or found therein. That *it was sufficient, if the court appeared to have jurisdiction, by the citizenship or alienage of the parties. The exemption from arrest in a district in which the defendant was not an inhabitant, or in which he was not found, at the time of serving the process, was the privilege of the defendant, which he might waive by a voluntary appearance. That if process was returned by the marshal, as served upon him within the district, it was sufficient; and that where the defendant voluntarily appeared in the court below, without taking the exception, it was an admission of the service, and a waiver of any further inquiry into the matter.
Motion denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.