Holliday v. Batson
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Swindell v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. (6th Cir. 1916)
- State ex rel. Andreu v. Canfield (Fla. 1898)
- Van Horn v. The Natchez (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana 1886)
- The City of Lincoln (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana 1883)
- Smith v. Clark (Supreme Court of the United States 1852)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In order to entitle a party to have a case docketed and dismissed, under the forty-third rule of court, the certificate of- the clerk of the court below must set forth an accurate titling of the case.
Mr. Barton having filed and read in open court a certificate in writing, in the following words and figures, to wit: —
“ In the above-entitled cause, I certify that a final judgment was rendered in the Circuit Court of the United States for the 9th (now 5th) Circuit and Eastern District of Louisiana, on the twentieth day of January, eighteen hundred and forty-one, and' that a writ of error was taken by the defendants, returnable to the January term, 1842, of the Supreme Court of the United States,
“ Witness mv hand, and the seal of said court, at New Orleans, this 4th Eebruary, 1845.
and moved the court .to docket and dismiss the -said writ of -error, under the forty-third rule of court. It is thereupon now. here considered and ordered by the court, that the said motion be, and the same is, hereby overruled, the titling of the case in the said certificate being too vague and uncertain.
The above motion was made and overruled at the preceding *646 term. At the present term, a certificate was filed, with a proper titling, and, on motion of Mr. Eustis, the case was docketed and dismissed. •
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.