Supreme Court of the United States, 1864

Gelpcke v. Dubuque

Gelpcke v. Dubuque
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 11, 1864 · Swayne, After Stating the Difference Between the Case and No. 80, and Quoting This Act, Thus
68 U.S. 220; 1 Wall. 220 (United States Reports)
Gelpcke v. Dubuque

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

68 U.S. 220 (____)
1 Wall. 220

GELPCKE ET AL.
v.
THE CITY OF DUBUQUE.

No. 81.

Supreme Court of United States.

*221 Mr. JUSTICE SWAYNE, after stating the difference between the case and No. 80, and quoting this act, thus delivered the opinion of the court:

"In this act it is clearly implied that cities have authority to subscribe for railroad stock, and to issue their bonds in payment of it. What is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed. (United States v. Babbitt, 1 Black, 61.) Considering the subject in the light of these acts, we entertain no doubt that the city possessed the power to issue these bonds."

JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.