Seymour v. Freer
Seymour v. Freer
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
We think that for the purposes of appeal this decree must be regarded as having been passed on the 20th, and that the bond was filed in time.
Hut if this were otherwise, and through' mistake or accident no bond, or a defective bond, had been filed, this eourtwould not .dismiss the ap.pea.1, except on failure to comply with an order to give the proper security within such reasonable time as it might prescribe.
In the present case a bond, admitted, to be sufficient for costs of prosecution, whether given in time'to'make appeal operate as a supersedeas or not, -was filed in the court below before removal to this court.
The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be
Denied.
Brobst v. Brobst, 2 Wallace, 96.
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Where, through mistake or accident, no bond, or a'defective bond, has been filed, this court will not dismiss the appeal, — if it is in all other respecta quite regulaf, — except on failure to comply with ati order to give the proper security within such reasonable time as it may prescribe.