Public Schools v. Walker
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Bruce (District Court, W.D. Kentucky 1943)
- Gas Products Co. v. Rankin (Mont. 1922)
- Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Omaha (8th Cir. 1914)
- Merchants' & Miners' Transp. Co. v. Robinson-Baxter-Dissosway Towing & Transportation Co. (1st Cir. 1912)
- Smith v. Davis (1st Cir. 1910)
- City of Manning v. German Ins. (8th Cir. 1901)
- Roberts v. Haggart (Supreme Court of Dakota 1886)
- Brooks v. Railroad Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1880)
- The Vera (1st Cir. 1915)
- Murray v. United States (Court of Claims 1911)
- Wetmore v. Karrick (Supreme Court of the United States 1907)
- Lynchburg Cotton Mill Co. v. Travelers' Ins. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia 1905)
- Pellett v. Great Northern Ry. Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington 1900)
- Brooks v. Raynolds (6th Cir. 1893)
- In re the Estate of Jessup (Cal. 1889)
- Bronson v. Schulten (Supreme Court of the United States 1882)
- American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. Sheldon (United States Circuit Courts 1880)
- Giant Powder Co. v. California Vigorit Powder Co. (United States Circuit Courts 1880)
- Winchester v. Winchester (Mass. 1876)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
now delivered' the opinion of the court.
No member of the court who concurred in the judgment desires a reargument, and the petition must, therefore, be denied.
The rule on this subject, long since established, was stated by Chief Justice Taney at the December Term, 1852, in these words:
“ No reargument will be granted in any case unless a member of the court who concurred in the judgment desires it, and when that is the case it will be ordered without waiting for the application of counsel.'’
The grounds of this rule were fully explained in that case, and need not be restated. *
Where the court does not on its own motion order a rehearing, it will be proper for counsel to submit without argument, as has been done in the present instance, a brief written or printed petition or suggestion of the point or points thought important. If upon such petition or suggestion any judge who concurred in the decision thinks proper to move for a rehearing the motion will be considered. If not so moved the rehearing will be denied as of course.
Brown v. Aspden, 14 Howard, 25; United States v. Knight’s Adm., 1 Black, 489.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.