Supreme Court of the United States, 1870

The Guy

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 28, 1870

76 U.S. 758; 19 L. Ed. 710; 9 Wall. 758; 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1028 (United States Reports)

Counsel

After argument by Mr. Eoarts, for the appellant, and Messrs. W. W. Goodrich and 0. Horwitz, contra,

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

The Surprise (1st Cir. 1904)
Cuddy v. Clement (1st Cir. 1902)
The Newport (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 1901)
The Valencia (Supreme Court of the United States 1897)
Huntington v. Proceeds of the Advance (2d Cir. 1896)
Logemann v. The Westover (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1896)
Gray v. Freights of the Kate (District Court, S.D. New York 1894)
McCaldin v. The Stroma (2d Cir. 1892)
George v. The Aeronaut (District Court, S.D. New York 1888)
The Mary Morgan (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1886)
Young v. Orpheus (Mass. 1875)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the judgment of the court, to the effect, that upon the facts established it was apparent that the case was to be governed by the principles settled at this term in the case of The Grapeshot, * and that the decree of the Circuit Court having been in accordance with those principles, must be

Affirmed.

Supra, 129.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.