Perrin v. United States
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2003)
- Doe v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2010)
- El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Company and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2004)
- The National Board Of The Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States (Court of Claims 1968)
- National Board of the Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States (Court of Claims 1968)
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States (Court of Claims 1972)
- Ingenio Porvenir C. Por A. v. United States (Court of Claims 1930)
- Northern Railroad v. The People (Supreme Court of the United States 1871)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
stated the case and delivered the judgment-of this court.
The petitioners alleged in the court below that they were naturalized citizens of the United States; that just before the' 18th of July, 1854, they arrived at San Juan del Norte, or Grey town, possessed of a valuable invoice of merchandise, with the intention of establishing a commercial house in some part of Central America; that on that day the town of San Juau was bombarded and burnt by the United States sloop-of-war Cyane, and all the merchandise, books, and papers of the petitioners, together with their personal effects. Appearance was entered by the Assistant Attorney-General, and he demurred to the petition because it did not set forth facts Sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the court below sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition. Whereupon the petitioners appealed to this court,-and alleged that the decision sustaining the demurrer was erroneous, but the court here, inasmuch as the claim is not one “founded upon any law of Congress, or upon any regulation of an executive department, or upon any contract, express or implied, with, the government of the United States,” concurs in opinion with thé- Court of Claims and-
Affirms the decree dismissing the petition.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.