Marqueze v. Bloom

Supreme Court of the United States December 15, 1872

Marqueze v. Bloom, 83 U.S. 351 (1872)

Opinion of the Court

The CHIEF JUSTICE:

No Federal question is referred to in the record or in the opinion. We have, therefore, no j-urisdiction of the ease,* and the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Gibson v. Chouteau, 8 Wallace, 314; Worthy v. The Commissioners, 9 Id. 613; Northern Railroad v. The People, 12 Id. 384.

Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published
Syllabus: A case brought here .as within the 25th section of the Judiciary Act dismissed ; neither the record nor the opinion of the Supreme Court, ■ which was in the records, showing any question before that court, except one relating to the interruption of a “prescription” (statute of limitations) set up as a defence, and the opinion showing that this question was decided exclusiyely upon the principles of the jurisprudence of the State.