Pargoud v. United States
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hempel v. Weedin (District Court, W.D. Washington 1928)
- Waters v. Barclay (Idaho 1937)
- Mulcahy & Gibson, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co. (City of New York Municipal Court 1913)
- Brandon v. United States (Court of Claims 1912)
- Guthrie v. Indemnity Ass'n (Tenn. 1899)
- Austin v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1894)
- White v. United States (Court of Claims 1884)
- Sierra v. United States (Court of Claims 1873)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
now gave the judgmentof theeourt.
We have recently decided, in the case of Armstrong v. United States, * that, the President’s proclamation of December 25th, 1868, granting pardon and amnesty unconditionally and without reservation to all who participated, directly *158 or indirectly, in the late rebellion, relieves claimants of captured and abandoned property from proof of adhesion to the United States during the late civil war. It was unnecessary, therefore, to prove such adhesion or personal pardon for taking part in the rebellion against the United States.
The judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing the petition is
Reversed.
Supra, fhe case immediately preceding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.