Collins v. Riggs

Supreme Court of the United States
Collins v. Riggs, 81 U.S. 491 (1872)
20 L. Ed. 723; 14 Wall. 491; 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1015

Collins v. Riggs

Opinion

Mr. Justice BRADLEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is clear that the criterion by which the amount tendered' was gauged was incorrect. To redeem property which has been sold under a mortgage for less than the mortgage debt, it is not sufficient to tender the amount of the sale. The whole mortgage debt must be tendered or paid into court. The party offer ing to redeem proceeds upon the hypothesis that, as to him, the mortgage has never been foreclosed and is still in existence. Therefore he can only lift it by paying it-. The money will be subject to distribution between the mortgagee and the purchaser, in equitable proportions, so as to reimburse the latter his purchase-money and pay the former the balance of his debt.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Cited By
19 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
To redeem property which has been sold under a mortgage (as is alleged irregularly) it is not sufficient to tender the amount of the sale. The whole mortgage-money must be tendered, or, if suit be brought, be paid into court.