Hall v. United States
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision. The 16 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Vines (United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama 1989)
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of Representatives (Mass. 2015)
- United States v. Conner (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 1989)
- Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human Services (D.C. Cir. 2015)
- United States v. Michaels (D. Minn. 1989)
- United States v. McDonough (D. Minn. 1989)
- United States v. Simpson (3d Cir. 1989)
- Paul Retfalvi v. United States (4th Cir. 2019)
- Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human Services (D.C. Cir. 2014)
- United States v. Rodney Earl Wilson (11th Cir. 1990)
- United States v. Mitchell King (10th Cir. 1989)
- United States v. Madison (District Court, W.D. Wisconsin 1989)
- United States v. Clark (District Court, S.D. New York 1989)
- United States v. German Munoz-Flores (9th Cir. 1988)
- Mulroy v. Block (District Court, N.D. New York 1983)
- State v. Thermoid Co. (N.J. 1954)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Suffice it tq ;say, that the suit in this case is in all material respects exactly similar to the foregoing ■ case, and that the pleadings filed by the defendants are precisely similar. It was commenced in the District Court; and the parties waived a jury, and the finding and judgment were for the plaintiffs. Exceptions were filed by the defendants, and they removed the cause into the Circuit-Court. All the questions in the Circuit Court were the same as in the preceding case; and the Circuit Court, ■having heard the parties, affirmed the judgment of the District Court-: whereupon the defendants sued out the'present writ of error. Due examination has since been given to the'case, and we find no error in the récord. Our reasons for the conclusion are given in the other case. Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.