Railroad Co. v. Wiswall
Railroad Co. v. Wiswall
90 U.S. 507; 23 L. Ed. 103; 23 Wall. 507; 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1329
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
74 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Garcia v. Island Program Designer, Inc. (1st Cir. 1993)
- United States v. Rice (Supreme Court of the United States 1946)
- Pas v. Travelers Insurance (3d Cir. 1993)
- Quackenbush v. Allstate Insurance (Supreme Court of the United States 1996)
- Eric Rothner D/B/A Chicago Game Co., and D/B/A Bell Vending, Inc. v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation (7th Cir. 1989)
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer (Supreme Court of the United States 1976)
- People of the State of New York v. Milton A. Galamison (2d Cir. 1965)
- Baines v. City of Danville, Virginia (4th Cir. 1964)
- Magnetic Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Dings Mfg. Co. (2d Cir. 1950)
- Mangold v. Analytic Services, Inc. (4th Cir. 1996)
- In the Matter of Amoco Petroleum Additives Company and Buck Isbell, in the Matter of Robin A.G. Jackson, an Underwriter at Lloyd's, London (7th Cir. 1992)
- Shotkin v. Perkins (10th Cir. 1949)
- Travelers' Protective Ass'n of America v. Smith (4th Cir. 1934)
- Anjali Shah v. Hyatt Corp (3d Cir. 2011)
- Shapiro v. Logistec Usa Inc. (2d Cir. 2005)
- Shapiro v. Logistec USA Inc. (2d Cir. 2005)
- Thomas A. Benson and Susan J. Benson v. Si Handling Systems, Inc., and Bt Systems, Inc. (7th Cir. 1999)
- Spring City Corp. v. American Buildings Co. (3d Cir. 1999)
- Personette v. Kennedy (In re Midgard Corp.) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Tenth Circuit 1997)
- Mangold v. Analytic Services, Inc. (4th Cir. 1996)
- Trans Penn Wax Corporation v. Michael Mccandless (3d Cir. 1995)
- In re Burns & Wilcox, Ltd., as General Agent for Agency Marketing And/or Individually (8th Cir. 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of Insurance Company v. Comstock. * †The order of the Circuit Court remanding the cause to the State court is not a “ final judgment” in the action, but a refusal to hear and decide. The remedy in such a ease is by mandamus to compel action, and not by writ of error to review what has been done. †
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.