Supreme Court of the United States, 1876

Gaines v. Hale

Gaines v. Hale
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 16, 1876 · Bradley
93 U.S. 3; 23 L. Ed. 782; 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1340; 3 Otto 3 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Submitted on- printed arguments by Mr. W. M. Bose for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Albert Pike, Mr. B. W. Johnson, Mr. J. B. Sanborn, and Mr. Frederick P. Stanton, for the defendants in error.

Gaines v. Hale

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice Bradley

The decision made by this court in Sot Springs Oases at the last term, 92 U. S. 698, has disposed of the principal controversy bet'weén the parties in this case, by declaring that neither of them is entitled to the land in question^ and that the same belongs to the United States. As the decree of the Supreme Court of Arkansas, in the present case, does not contravene this decision, but refuses aid to any of the parties against each other, except as to the improvements erected by each respectively, and as to these, saves the rights of the United States, we do not perceive any error in said decree on any Federal question. Decree affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.