Supreme Court of the United States, 1879

Arthur v. Herold

Arthur v. Herold
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 15, 1879 · Waite
100 U.S. 75 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Assistant Attorney-Greneral Smith for the plaintiff in error., Mr. Stephen Gr. Olarhe for the defendant in error.

Arthur v. Herold

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court. ■

We think it was not error for the court to say to the jury that ground chicory was the same thing, as burnt chicory. The chicory root cannot- be ground until it is burned, and burnt chicory is not an article of commerce until it is ground. *78Whether or not the article importéd was a new preparation, and something other than ground chicory, that is to say, whether it was prepared chicory and not simply ground chicory, was a question of fact that was properly left to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.