Supreme Court of the United States, 1879

Leavenworth v. Kinney

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 3, 1879 · Waite

154 U.S. 642; 14 S. Ct. 1198; 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1375 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. M. H. Carpenter for plaintiff in error., Mr. T. A. Hurd and Mr. L. B. Wheat for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Department of Revenue v. Carpet Warehouse, Inc. (Or. 1984)
Cunningham v. County of Hawaii (Haw. 1945)
Drew v. Superior Court of Mendocino County (Cal. 1919)
Wilson v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1911)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is substantially disposed of by that of Board of County Commissioners of the County of Leavenworth v. Sellew, just decided, 99 U. S. 624. A peremptory writ of mandamus has been ordered against the mayor and council of the city of Leavenworth in their corporate capacity, and the objection is that it should have been directed to the persons who were mayor and councilmen. The principle upon which the decision in the other case rests is conclusive of this, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is consequently affirmed, and the cause remanded with authority, if necessary, to so modify the order which has been entered, in respect to the time for the levy and collection of the tax, as to make the writ effective for the end to be accomplished. Affirmed,.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.