Supreme Court of the United States, 1880

Gage v. Carraher

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 12, 1880 · Waite

154 U.S. 656; 14 S. Ct. 1190; 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1549 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Henry D. Beam for appellant., Mr. James E. Munroe and Mr. W. C. Goudy for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Meyer v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1935)
Rockmore v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Ins. (2d Cir. 1933)
Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1924)
Danks v. Gordon (2d Cir. 1921)
Raphael v. Trask (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York 1902)
Yarnell v. Felton (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1900)
Yarnell v. Felton (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee 1900)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The order remanding this cause to the state court is affirmed qn the authority of Meyer v. Construction Co., 100 U. S. 457. • Carraher occupies one side of the controversy about which the suit is brought, that is to say, the title to the property in question* and Portia Gage, Henry H. Gage and John Forsythe the other. Henry H. Gage and Forsythe are citizens of the same State with Carraher. There is no controversy in the suit which is wholly between citizens of different States and which can be fully determined as between them. Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.