Pollard v. Railroad Co.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Stamp v. Union Stevedoring Corp. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1925)
- Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co. (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1895)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
A judgment in an action of assumpsit, brought by a husband and wife, on a contract by a carrier of passengers to carry the wife safely, for injuries to the wife while being carried, is a bar to another action of assumpsit on the same contract, by the husband alone, to recover for the same injuries. A different rule
*225 prevails when the action is in tort against the carrier for a breach of his public duty, except, perhaps, in States like New Jersey, where by statute the husband may, in such an action, add claims in his own right to those of his wife. Rev. Laws N. J. 851, sect. 22.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.