Seward v. Corneau
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Oliver Aresti v. Soto (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1940)
- Oliver Aresti v. Soto (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1940)
- Clark v. Bank of Union (W. Va. 1913)
- Jahn v. Champagne Lumber Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin 1908)
- Schrot v. Schoenfeld (D.C. Cir. 1904)
- Henderson v. Indiana Trust Co. (Ind. 1895)
- Consolidated Tank Line Co. v. Kansas City Varnish Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri 1891)
- Deford, Hinkle & Co. v. Mehaffy (United States Circuit Courts 1882)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The bond in this case is insufficient in form either for the purposes of a supersedeas or an appeal, inasmuch as it contains no security for costs. This, however, does not'necessarily avoid the appeal; but-we may impose such terms on the appellants for the omission as, under the circumstances, shall seem to be proper. Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304; Davidson v. Lanier, 4 Wall. 447. The appeal will, therefore, be dismissed, unless the appellants, on or before the first Monday in January next, give bond, with good and sufficient security, in due form of law, to prosecute their appeal to effect, and to answer all damages and costs if they fail to make their plea good; the bond to be in the penal sum of $1,000, and the security taken and approved by the justice of this court assigned to the fifth circuit; and it is
So ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.