Supreme Court of the United States, 1881

The" Mamie"

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 31, 1881 · Ohiee, Waite, Gray, Bxatcheobd

105 U.S. 773; 26 L. Ed. 937; 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2188; 15 Otto 773 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Alfred Russell in support of the motion., Mr. A. B. Maynard and Mr. II. H. Swan, contra.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Troy Bank of Troy v. Whitehead (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky 1910)
Hagge v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri 1900)
Ex Parte Baltimore and Ohio Rr Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1882)
Singer v. Singer (Tenn. 1909)
Wheless v. City of St. Louis (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri 1899)
Clay v. Field (Supreme Court of the United States 1891)
Estes v. Gunter (Supreme Court of the United States 1887)
Henderson v. Wadsworth (Supreme Court of the United States 1885)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*774 Mb: Ohiee Justice Waite

delivered :tlie .opinion of the ■ court. •

The record has not been printed, but the value of the matter in dispute,' as shown by the briefs submitted, is at least the full amount'of all the claims agáinst the owners of the “Mamie ” •in the several-suits which it was the object of. this proceeding to defeat, as against anything else than the boat or her value.. This, according to tbé showing now made, is largely in excess of 85,000.

Motion denied'. '

Mb.- Justice Gray and Mr. Justice Bxatcheobd did ' not sit in this case, nor take any part in deciding it.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.