Murphy v. United States
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision. The 11 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Deal v. Federal Housing Administration (8th Cir. 1958)
- Pope v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1944)
- St. L., B. & M. Ry. v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1925)
- St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1925)
- City of Rawlins v. Jungquist (Wyo. 1908)
- Hooe v. United States (Court of Claims 1908)
- Hunt v. County Commissioners (Me. 1905)
- Weston v. Falk (Neb. 1902)
- P. H. McLaughlin & Co. v. United States (Court of Claims 1901)
- Finney v. United States (Court of Claims 1897)
- Harte v. Castetter (Neb. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
■ We are clearly of the opinion that the acceptance by the claimant, without objection, of the amount allowed b.y the Secretary of the Navy, in his adjustment of the account presented to him, was equivalent to a final ¿ettlement arid compromise of all the items of the present claim included in that account. There is nothing in the findings of the court below to warrant a judgment in favor of the claimant upon the only item *465 included in the petition in this case which was not mentioned specifically in the account presented to the Secretary of the Navy and passed on by him in the adjustment he made.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.