Supreme Court of the United States, 1882

Independent School-Dist. Ackley, Hardin County, Iowa v. Hall

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 18, 1882

106 U.S. 428; 1 S. Ct. 417; 27 L. Ed. 237; 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1557; 16 Otto 428 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. John II Estate, Ltd. (9th Cir. 1937)
Weinstein v. Black Diamond SS Corporation (2d Cir. 1929)
Hanson v. C. B. & Q. R. R. (Wyo. 1923)
Baglin v. Earl-Eagle Mining Co. (Utah 1919)
Bernard v. Lea (4th Cir. 1913)
Columbia Heights Realty Co. v. Rudolph (Supreme Court of the United States 1910)
United States v. Pena (Supreme Court of the United States 1899)
Chanute City v. Trader (Supreme Court of the United States 1889)
Gumbel v. Pitkin (Supreme Court of the United States 1885)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

106 U.S. 428

1 S.Ct. 417

27 L.Ed. 237

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL-DIST. ACKLEY, HARDIN COUNTY, IOWA,
v.
HALL.

December 18, 1882.

Galusha Parsons, for plaintiff in error.

A. T. Britton and Walter H. Smith, for defendant in error.

WAITE, C. J.

These motions are denied. A failure to annex to or return with a writ of error an assignment of errors, as required by section 997 of the Revised Statutes, is no ground for dismissal for want of jurisdiction. If an assignment is filed in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 4, rule 21, it will ordinarily be enough.

There is not in this case such a color of right to a dismissal as to make it proper for us to consider the motion to affirm. Whitney v. Cook, 99 U. S. 607.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.