Supreme Court of the United States, 1882

Feibelman v. Packard

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 18, 1882 · Waite

108 U.S. 14; 1 S. Ct. 138; 27 L. Ed. 634; 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1275 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. J. Bay, and Mr. B. G. Coll for plaintiff., Mr. Beckwith for defendant.

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

Schwartz v. Weingart (2d Cir. 1935)
Doll v. Blasius (3d Cir. 1934)
Babcock v. Norton (2d Cir. 1924)
Stanley v. Greenberg (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 1914)
Provident Life & Trust Co. of Philadelphia v. Camden & T. Ry. Co. (3d Cir. 1910)
Port v. Schloss Bros. & Co. (3d Cir. 1907)
Fitzpatrick v. Graham (2d Cir. 1902)
Loveless v. Ransom (7th Cir. 1901)
The Bylands (5th Cir. 1916)
Winters v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1908)
Territory of Hawaii v. Ah Sing (Haw. 1907)
Kidder v. Fidelity Ins., Trust & Safe-Deposit Co. (7th Cir. 1901)
Huebschmann v. Cotzhausen (Wis. 1900)
West v. Irwin (7th Cir. 1893)
Humes v. Third Nat. Bank (5th Cir. 1893)
Hardee v. Wilson (Supreme Court of the United States 1892)
Estis v. Trabue (Supreme Court of the United States 1888)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

Moses Feibelman and (George Yoelker, as .partners, sued the defendants in error to recover .damages for the seizure of their-partnership goods by Packard, marshal of the United States for the District of Louisiana. A judgment was rendered .against them. Their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately.' Feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and *15 severance, or other equivalent proceeding. It follows that the writ must he dismissed, on the authority of Williams v. Ban k of the United States, 11 Wheat. 414; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall 416; Simpson v. Greeley, 20 Wall. 152; and it is

/So ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.