Supreme Court of the United States, 1882

Bonnifield v. Price

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 27, 1882 · Waite

154 U.S. 672; 14 S. Ct. 1194; 26 L. Ed. 1022; 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1296 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. John W. Hammond, Mr. G. TV. Potter and Mr. E. P. Johnson for plaintiff in error., Mr. George F. Price for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Shields v. Mongollon Exploration Co. (9th Cir. 1905)
Mellon v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad (Supreme Court of the United States 1882)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to bring here for review a judgment of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Wyoming in a case where the trial was not by jury. It is therefore dismissed on the authority of Hecht v. Boughton, 105 U. S. 235, decided at the present term. The appropriate remedy in this case, under the act of April 7, 1874, ch. 80, Sup. Rev. Stat. .12, was by appeal.

But if we could treat this writ of error as an appeal, thé case is in no condition for examination here, because there is no such statement of facts in the record as the law requires. The bill of exceptions taken in the District Court contains all the evidence, and as- the Supreme Court directed a judgment in.favor of the defendant, it is clear that court passed on other questions than such as were presented on the rulings in the admission of evidence, Under these circumstances a statement of facts such as *673 the statute requires is necessary to enable us to reexamine the case. The writ is dismissed.

Mr. John W. Hammond, Mr. G. TV. Potter and Mr. E. P. Johnson for plaintiff in error. Mr. George F. Price for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.