Supreme Court of the United States, 1884

Nickle v. Stewart

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 5, 1884 · Waite

111 U.S. 776; 4 S. Ct. 700; 28 L. Ed. 599; 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1836 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. J. W. Davis for appellants., No appearance for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Klapprott (District Court, D. New Jersey 1947)
Irvin v. Buick Motor Co. (8th Cir. 1937)
Peeke v. Citizens Banking Co. (6th Cir. 1935)
Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. (8th Cir. 1932)
Thomas v. South Butte Mining Co. (9th Cir. 1916)
Cocke v. Copenhaver (4th Cir. 1903)
Camp Mfg. Co. v. Parker (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina 1903)
Hendryx v. Perkins (1st Cir. 1902)
Halsted v. Forest Hill Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia 1901)
Rudolph v. Hunt (District Court, District of Columbia 1923)
Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Gittings (Md. 1906)
Schaefer v. Wunderle (Ill. 1895)
Willamette Iron Bridge Co. v. Hatch (Supreme Court of the United States 1888)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the'opinion of the court.

Without intending to decide that an appeal lies to this court from an order óf a circuit court, or of a district court exercising circuit court powers, refusing leave to file a bill of review, we hold that the refusal in this case was right.. The bill as presented has none of the characteristics of a bill of review. No errors of law appearing on the face of the record are assigned, and there is no allegation of any discovery of new matter since the decree was rendered.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.