Ex Parte Harding
Cases that cite this one
47 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Hale v. Crawford (1st Cir. 1933)
- Elizabeth Ann Duke v. The State of Texas (5th Cir. 1973)
- Selby v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction (Md. 2001)
- Sykes v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (Md. 2001)
- Hill v. Town of Conway (1st Cir. 1999)
- Draughn v. Jabe (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1992)
- Williams v. Wayne County Sheriff (Mich. 1975)
- Keener v. Tennessee (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1968)
- Smith v. Brough (District Court, D. Maryland 1965)
- Louis Wilson v. State of Nebraska, Maurice H. Sigler, Warden of the Nebraska State Penitentiary, Lincoln, Nebraska (8th Cir. 1963)
- United States ex rel. Leguillou v. Davis (District Court, Virgin Islands 1953)
- Edmondson v. Brady (Md. 1947)
- Noland v. Noland (9th Cir. 1940)
- Bridwell v. Aderhold (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 1935)
- Selness v. United States (9th Cir. 1933)
- Pennsylvania v. Ritchie (Supreme Court of the United States 1987)
- Ex parte Jim Hong (9th Cir. 1914)
- McComb v. Fourth Judicial District Court (Nev. 1913)
- Ex parte Moran (8th Cir. 1906)
- Ex parte Diaz (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1904)
- Ex parte Diaz (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1904)
- Cuyler v. Atlantic & N. C. R. Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina 1904)
- Greer v. Richards (Ariz. 1890)
- Ex parte Ulrich (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri 1890)
- Smith v. State (Md. 1965)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This motion is denied.. This court has no jurisdiction for ' the discharge on habeas corpus of a person imprisoned under the sentence of a territorial court in a criminal case, unless the sentence exceeds the jurisdiction of that court, or there is no *784 authority to hold him under the sentence. Ex parte Wilson, 114 U. S. 417, 420, and the cases there cited. The fact that a law of the. territory allowed an alien who had declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States to sit on a grand jury, and that an-alien did- in fact sit on the jury that found the indictment against this' petitioner, did not deprive the court of its jurisdiction for his trial under the indictment. • The objection, if it be one, goes only to the regu-. larity of the proceedings, not to the jurisdiction of the court. The same is true of the allegation in the petition that the petitioner was denied his right to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor. For such errors or irregularities, if they exist, a judgment is not void, and a writ of habeas corpus gives this court no authority for their correction.
Motion denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.