Supreme Court of the United States, 1888

Pacific Express Co. v. Malin

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 26, 1888 · Pee

131 U.S. 394; 9 S. Ct. 792; 33 L. Ed. 204; 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. William JELallett Phillips for the motion., No one opposing.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin (Supreme Court of the United States 1888)
The Washington (2d Cir. 1926)
The Washington (2d Cir. 1926)
Draper v. Clark (Ohio 1898)
Radford v. Folsom (Supreme Court of the United States 1888)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per curiam

: This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Dismissed.

Mr. Phillips, at a later day, moved the court for the issuance of a mandate, and, as cause therefor, he stated that no notice of the motion for the mandate had been served on the opposite party; but that no opposition had been made to the dismissal of the case, and, as the dismissal had been made for want of jurisdiction, there would seem to be no reason why the mandate should be withheld.

Pee cueiam

: Sufficient cause has been shown, and the mandate may issue at once.

Mandate issued.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.