Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1888

Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin

Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 26, 1888
131 U.S. 394; 33 L. Ed. 204; 9 S. Ct. 792; 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046 (United States Reports)

Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin

Opinion

131 U.S. 394

9 S.Ct. 792

33 L.Ed. 204

PACIFIC EXP. CO.
v.
MALIN.

November 26, 1888.1

William H. Phillips, for the motion.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

2

Mr. Phillips, for defendant in error, afterwards moved for the issuance of a mandate, and stating that no notice of the motion for the mandate had been served on the opposite party, but that no opposition had been made to the dismissal of the case.

3

PER CURIAM.

4

Sufficient cause has been shown, and the mandate may issue at once. Mandate issued.

1

Publication delayed through failure to receive copy.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑