Supreme Court of the United States, 1889

Spalding v. Manasse

Spalding v. Manasse
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 13, 1889 · Fuller
131 U.S. 65; 9 S. Ct. 649; 33 L. Ed. 86; 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1803 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Assistant Attorn*y General Maury for plaintiff in error in each case., Mr. Percy L. Shmnorn for defendants in error.

Spalding v. Manasse

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Me. Chief Justice Eullee

delivered the opinion of the court.

*66 All of these cases were tried by the court without a. jury, by agreement of the parties, as alleged in the record; but therq is no allegation that the stipulation was in writing, as required by the statute; and, under the ruling in Bond v. Dustin, 112 U. S. 604, and Dundee Mortgage Company v. Hughes, 124 U. S. 157, no error can be examined in the rulings of the court at the trial. Ve can only inquire whether the declarations were respectively sufficient to sustain the judgments. As there appears to be no érror in this regard, the judgments are severally

Affirmed..

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.