Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. Marsh

Supreme Court of the United States April 1, 1889

Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. Marsh, 131 U.S. 401 (1889)

9 S. Ct. 791; 32 L. Ed. 538; 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1830

Per Curiam

Opinion

Per curiam:

On consideration of the motion for a retaxation of costs in this cause, and of the argument of counsel thereupon, had as well in support of as against the same:

It is now here ordered by the court that the amount advanced by the appellants in this cause towards printing the record be recoverable by them from the appellees herein.

[This order is entitled only in ,the cross-suit of Nichols v. Marsh.]

Reference

Full Case Name: Nichols, Shepard and Company v. Marsh
Status: Published
Syllabus: M. filed a bill in equity against S. for tlie infringement of letters patent. S. answered and filed a cross-bill. The decree dismissed the original bill from which M. appealed. Thereupon S. took an appeal in the cross suit from rulings excluding evidence. In this court the clerk required S. to pay one half the cost of printing the record. This court, after argument, affirmed the decree dismissing the original bill, and dismissed the cross-appeal. 128 U. S. 605. Held, that S. was entitled to recover of M. the amount so paid.