Supreme Court of the United States, 1890

Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 3, 1890 · Per Curiam

136 U.S. 578; 10 S. Ct. 1064; 34 L. Ed. 540; 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2230 (United States Reports)

Counsel

' Mr. Assistant Attorney General Ma/ary for plaintiff in error. -, Mr. George A. Nourse for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Stewart (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1939)
O'Donnell v. United States (9th Cir. 1936)
Standard Oil Co. of California v. United States (9th Cir. 1940)
United States v. Thibodeaux (5th Cir. 1916)
Stewart v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1942)
United States v. Stewart (9th Cir. 1941)
Work v. United States ex rel. O'Donnell (D.C. Cir. 1927)
DeProft v. Heydecker (Ill. 1921)
Beer v. Whiteville Lumber Co. (N.C. 1915)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is conceded by counsel for plaintiff in error that this case is governed by Wright v. Roseberry, 121 U. S. 488, and the judgment is, therefore, upon the authority of that case,

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.