Supreme Court of the United States, 1891

Evans v. State Bank

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 25, 1891 · Fuller

141 U.S. 107; 11 S. Ct. 885; 35 L. Ed. 654; 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2502 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. A. H.- Garland and Mr. II. J. May for appellants. Mr. W. W. Dudley .and Mr. L. T. Michenor were with them on the brief. •, Mr. J. McConnell for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision.

Fidelity Storage Co. v. Jaques (D.C. Cir. 1935)
De Laval Separator Co. v. Iowa Dairy Separator Co. (8th Cir. 1912)
Jefferson Hotel Co. v. Brumbaugh (4th Cir. 1909)
Gage v. J. F. Smyth Mercantile Co. (8th Cir. 1908)
Hussey v. Richardson-Roberts Dry Goods Co. (8th Cir. 1906)
Wiser v. Lawler (Ariz. 1900)
Hutchins v. Munn (D.C. 1906)
Fitchett v. Blows (8th Cir. 1896)
McKinley v. Williams (8th Cir. 1896)
Snider v. Dobson (8th Cir. 1896)
Richardson v. Van Auken (D.C. Cir. 1895)
Grafton v. Paine (D.C. Cir. 1895)
United States v. Winona & St. P. R. (8th Cir. 1895)
Gunn v. Black (8th Cir. 1894)
Warren v. Burt (8th Cir. 1893)
Crawford v. Neal (Supreme Court of the United States 1892)
Furrer v. Ferris (Supreme Court of the United States 1892)
York v. Tyler (D.C. 1892)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Fuller, C. J.:

This case was decided by the Circuit Court in favor of the State National Bank, upon the-facts, and after a patient investigation of the record, with the aid afforded by the arguments and briefs of counsel, we are unable to hold that the Circuit Court erred in the conclusions at which it arrived.

The decree will, therefore, be

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.