Supreme Court of the United States, 1891

Birdseye v. Schaeffer

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 27, 1891 · Per Curiam

140 U.S. 117; 11 S. Ct. 885; 35 L. Ed. 402; 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2441 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Philip B. Thompson and Mr. J. M. Vale for the'motion., Mr. Bethel Coopwood and Mr.. John Hancock opposing.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Birdseye v. Shaeffer (Supreme Court of the United States 1891)
Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1898)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of Gurnee v. Patrick County, 137 U. S. 141; Richmond & Danville Railroad Co. v. Thouron, 131 U. S. 45.

Dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.